Bibliographic record
Abstract
A perimeter ring road is being constructed around the City of Edmonton that is referred to as Anthony Henday Drive. Funding for the project is being provided by Alberta Transportation. The ring road alignment includes a crossing of the North Saskatchewan River in the southwest corner of the city. A 360 m long bridge was proposed for crossing the North Saskatchewan River. The short-term design for the crossing included two lanes in each direction with an ultimate design of eight lanes. Significant approach fills for the proposed bridge structures were required on both sides of the river. Based on the proposed vertical alignment, the maximum difference in height from the crest of fill to river level was approximately 35 m on the west side and 28 m on the east side. The width of the embankment at the crest is approximately 55 m, with sideslopes of 4H:1V. This equates to a footprint width of approximately 200 m on the floodplain that is present along the east side. Headslope angles for the embankments of 3H:1V were proposed, with a minimum setback of 20 m, for environmental considerations, from the crest of the riverbank to the toe of the approach fill. The primary focus of this paper is the approach fill design for the east side of the river.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".