MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W817766415

Queer (In)justice: The Criminalization of LGBT People in the United States/African Sexual Diversity: Politics, Theory, Citizenship

2014· article· en· W817766415 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mechthild Nagel

Bibliographic record

VenueWagadu · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCriminalizationQueerCitizenshipSociologyCriminologyGender studiesPoliticsQueer theoryHuman sexualityInjusticeLawEconomic JusticePolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Review of Queer (In)justice: The Criminalization of LGBT People in United States by Joey L. Mogul, Andrea J. Ritchie, and Kay Whitlock, Beacon Press, 2011;African Sexual Diversity: Politics, Theory, Citizenship by S.N. Nyeck and Marc Epprecht (eds.), McGill-Queens University Press, 2013.Mechthild NagelQueer (In)justice is a bold book. There is no discussion of merits of marriage or of serving in U.S. military. Instead it castigates, perhaps at times too harshly, mainstream LGBT academics, lawyers and advocacy organizations for their complicity with injustice complex (noted here for good measure as criminal legal system). The authors claim that crime is a social construction as record shows that certain populations deserve to be singled out as criminals; hence justice is an elusive ideal in a web of mutually reinforcing institutions that favor rich, white, straight, able- bodied, socially connected person.Despite authors' protestations to contrary, brief history of sexual terrorization of indigenous peoples certainly recasts Foucault's famous History of Sexuality as a history of European sexuality with its central thesis that as late as Victorian age the homosexual was classified as a species. European were quite adamant about enforcing a gender binary and straight sex behavior among indigenous peoples in Americas. They committed grave atrocities left unmentioned in standard histories of conquest.Mogul, Ritchie, and Whitlock postulate three incriminating archetypes: gleeful gay killers, lethal lesbians, and deceptive gender benders and chronicle violent, humiliating police profiling practices, e.g. for crime of walking while trans.The show that death penalty cases are replete with overt homophobic statements to jury that sometimes even includes defense attorney. Gender nonconforming, not- convicted persons face probing eyes and touch of police even at point of emergency life-saving intervention by medical personnel. 19th Century sumptuary laws, regulating status-appropriate clothing (along class and gender lines), still haunt policing imagination. Transwomen and transmen face daily humiliation in nation's prisons, being ridiculed, taunted or raped. They may be thrown into solitary confinement for audacity of asking for a bra for health reasons or for refusing a bra (e.g., after breast removal).Several myths are discussed and confronted, which alone makes this book an important primer for understanding processes of criminalization of LGBTQ persons. For instance, there's an old conflation of female sex workers being lesbians, and Freudian anxieties are paraded for such justification. Secondly, walking while trans may also bring about an automatic prostitution charge with sometimes lethal consequences for transgender person. Prosecutors are known to have launched adage that prisons are queer havens, hence life imprisonment would not be felt as punishment; they have thus asked juries to consider death penalty! It is known that prisons are extremely dangerous places for LGBTQ and gender non-conforming persons, and unless one hooks up early, one may be prey to gang rapes. Controversially, authors also bring up myth of hate crime laws deterring crimes against LGBT persons. They note two problems with these reform laws: there is attention given to individual grievances rather than systematic oppression, and therefore, laws tend to backfire, as we have seen with anti- Black racism. Instead of prosecuting whites who commit racist acts against Black people, hate crime laws have disproportionately targeted Black people (p. 126-8). Clearly, laws will not protect us from homophobic or transphobic (speech) acts committed on streets or in courtroom.Turning a queer eye to evolution of police and prisons from colonial times to present reveals scope and impacts of law and order agendas-not just on LGBT people, but more broadly on all communities disproportionately impacted by policing and punishment. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWagaduSame topicAfrican Sexualities and LGBTQ+ IssuesFrench-language works237,207