MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W818163135 · doi:10.60082/2817-5069.2831

Homeownership and America’s Financial Underclass: Flawed Premises, Broken Promises, New Prescriptions, by Mechele Dickerson

2015· article· en· W818163135 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jonathan L. York

Bibliographic record

VenueOsgoode Hall law journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisionUnderclassProsperityPopulationDreamSecuritizationPolitical scienceSociologyEconomicsLawFinancePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HOMEOWNERSHIP HAS TRADITIONALLY BEEN a major goal for Americans seeking financial prosperity and success. It is considered to be the lynchpin of the lifelong pursuit of the “American Dream.” People grow up with cliché visions of having a young, happy family living in a home with a recently paid off mortgage and a white picket fence. Fully paying off a mortgage can be one of the happiest and most rewarding moments of one’s life. However, Mechele Dickerson emphasizes that perhaps the pursuit of homeownership is not always sound advice for a large portion of the population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOsgoode Hall law journalSame topicHousing, Finance, and NeoliberalismFrench-language works237,207