MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W818516275

Transit Projects Seek Voter Approval for Financial Support

2008· article· en· W818516275 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brendan Read

Bibliographic record

VenueMetrologia · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinanceTransit (satellite)MileDozenInvestment (military)BallotBusinessGovernment (linguistics)Light rail transitTransport engineeringBondRail transitPublic transportTransit systemPolitical scienceEngineeringGeographyPoliticsVoting
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article provides an overview of about a dozen transit financing ballot measures that will go to voters in Fall 2008. If all are approved, they will amount to some $55 billion for transit investment. The author describes a $42 billion package for transit and highways in Arizona, a $10 bond issue for initial financing of a high-speed rail line between San Francisco and Los Angeles, a 25 percent sales tax increase to finance a 70-mile regional rail and trail project in Sonoma County, various light rail, commuter rail and regional bus expansion in the Puget Sound area, as well as other projects. Also described are olans for expansion of Metro Vancouver and TransLink in Canada, where the provincial government has the last say on transit, rather than voters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.289
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMetrologiaSame topicTransportation Planning and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207