MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W820167731

水稻MOC1 mRNA TaqMan实时荧光定量RT-PCR检测方法的建立

2008· article· zh· W820167731 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
高东, 孙宏伟, 刘雪清, 何霞红, 王云月, 李成云, 朱有勇

Bibliographic record

Venue分子植物育种 · 2008
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaqManReal-time polymerase chain reactionMessenger RNAMolecular biologyBiologyVirologyComputational biologyGeneticsGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TA克隆构建含MOC1基因cDNA片段的重组质粒,作为TaqMan定量检测水稻分蘖基因MOC1 mRNA的标准品,建立了检测方法。采用RT—PCR。的方法,从水稻分蘖芽总RNA中逆转录扩增总cDNA,PCR扩增MOC1基因中设计的目的片段,将纯化的目的片段与pMD19-T Simple载体连接,转化宿主菌JM-109,提取重组质粒DNA,PCR鉴定并测序分析。纯化质粒并检测260nm吸光值,确定重组质粒原液的拷贝浓度并以此制备荧光定量PCR梯度浓度标准品。对重组质粒进行实时荧光定量PCR实验。建立了MOC1基因mRNA表达实时荧光定量PCR检测方法,特异性好,检测灵敏度达10^2拷贝,线性范围为10^2-10^7拷贝,阈值循环数与PCR体系中起始模板量的对数值之间有着良好的线性关系(r=0.999),扩增效率高(E=92.8%)。成功建立了MOCI基因实时荧光PCR定量标准品,且TaqMan荧光定量RT—PCR的方法可对水稻分蘖基因MOC1 mRNA的表达进行准确定量。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue分子植物育种Same topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207