MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W821771204

A REVIEW OF BRITISH COLUMBIA'S TRAFFIC SIGNAL CLEARANCE INTERVAL PRACTICES

2002· review· en· W821771204 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jonas Voss

Bibliographic record

VenueITE 2002 Annual Meeting and ExhibitInstitute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraffic signalSIGNAL (programming language)Interval (graph theory)Transport engineeringAdvisory committeeOperations researchComputer scienceGeographyEngineeringPolitical sciencePublic administrationReal-time computingMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A review is presented of the current practice in the Canadian Province of British Columbia (BC) on the determination of vehicle clearance intervals at signalized intersections. The paper was prepared to provide input into the ITE Traffic Signal Timing Advisory Committee (TSTAC). One of TSTAC's aims is to develop a recommended practice for the determination of yellow and all-red vehicle clearance intervals at a traffic signal. Provincial procedures are presented and compared to the legal requirements as spelled out in the BC Motor Vehicle Act. A survey of 14 municipalities throughout BC on their clearance interval procedures is also provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0130.026
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueITE 2002 Annual Meeting and ExhibitInstitute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)Same topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207