Bibliographic record
Abstract
本研究将紫杆柽柳（Tamarix and rossowii Litv）晚期胚胎发生丰富蛋白（LEADQ663481）基因导入新疆早熟棉新陆早18号,通过冬季海南加代、夏季新疆继代的方法获得T3代转基因棉花株系。从40株大田卡那霉素检测阳性植株中,经过PCR筛选证明3株为阳性的转化株。在室内条件下,对转化株幼苗进行水培实验,并用12%（w/v）PEG-6000处理12h模拟干旱胁迫。结果显示,干旱胁迫之后,转LEA基因棉花基因表达量显著增加;丙二醛生成量显著降低;游离脯氨酸、可溶性糖、可溶性蛋白的生成量显著增加;棉花表型分析也证明了转LEA基因棉花抗旱性有提高。培养45d后,转LEA基因棉花的生物量高于非转基因棉花。本研究结果表明,在干旱胁迫条件下,转LEA基因棉花表现出了优良的生长和生理优势,显示出转LEA基因棉花能提高棉花的抗旱能力。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".