MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W825761451

香蕉MuMA DS2的克隆、序列分析和表达分析

2008· article· zh· W825761451 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
杨晓颖, 刘菊华, 徐碧玉, 金志强

Bibliographic record

Venue分子植物育种 · 2008
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLegume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

根据抑制缩减文库获得的一个MADS-box基因片段,从香蕉果实cDNA文库中,采用RT-PCR技术分离获得一个全长cDNA,经序列测定和同源性分析表明,该cDNA含705bp的完整的开放阅读框,编码234个氨基酸残基的MADS-box蛋白,将其命名为MuMADS2。MuMADS2具有植物MADS-box基因家族中特有的M、I、K和C四个结构域,与芦笋、风信子、蝴蝶兰和百合的MADS-box基因的氨基酸序列存在很高的一致性(82%、78%、77%和75%)。将MuMADS2与其它植物来源的MADS-box基因进行序列比较发现,MuMADS2属于MADS-box基因的AGAMOUS亚族的D世系。RT-PCR分析表明,MuMADS2仅在生殖器官(花和果)中表达,在营养器官(根、茎和叶)中不表达。进一步分析发现MuMADS2仅在雄花和雌花的子房、由雌花发育而成的果实中表达,而在雄花和和雌花的柱头和花柱都不表达。推测MuMADS2可能在果实的发育和成熟过程中起作用。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue分子植物育种Same topicLegume Nitrogen Fixing SymbiosisFrench-language works237,207