Dietary influences on the secretion into anddegradation of mucin in the digestive tract ofmonogastric animals and humans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current information on the effect of diet on the secretion of mucus and the recovery of mucin in ileal digesta is summarized. A general description of mucus structure and its degradation in the small and large intestine is provided. As the protective lining of the entire gastrointestinal tract, mucus gels are exposed to all chemical and physical forces of digestion. Most important among these is the proteolytic breakdown of mucus gels into component mucin subunits and their subsequent release into the intestinal lumen. Erosion of mucus gels is countered by synthesis and secretion from the underlying epithelium. Diets can influence this process, both indirectly by their effects on digestive processes most importantly with respect to the amount and distribution of proteolytic enzymes in the intestinal lumen, and directly by the physical forces which they exert on the gastrointestinal mucosa. Adaptive changes in goblet cell activity have been noted in response to different diets. Once in the intestinal lumen, little further degradation of mucus occurs prior to the large intestine. Once in the large intestine mucin is fermented by resident microbial populations. The recovery of undegraded mucin in ileal digesta has important implications for nutritional studies: firstly because it may represent a considerable loss of endogenous amino acids and carbohydrates and secondly because it may provide insight into the effects of diets on the digestive tract itself.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".