MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W827841679

Ipswich walks away from 1960s

2005· article· en· W827841679 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S Cumberbatch

Bibliographic record

VenueSurveyor magazine · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedestrianCarriagewayTransport engineeringBus priorityRing roadPlan (archaeology)Public transportPopulationSignageQuarter (Canadian coin)Work (physics)Control (management)Pedestrian crossingEngineeringTelecommunicationsComputer scienceBusinessGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Suffolk County Council, UK, has plans for a �15M package to improve pedestrian and cycling facilities and bus services with a comprehensive urban traffic management and control (UTMC) system. The plans are needed to increase the capacity of the town's roads to meet the expected increase in population. The 1960s inner-ring road is approaching capacity on many sections at peak periods. The plan is to extend the current bus loop eastwards, allowing Upper Brook Street, the main thoroughfare, to be pedestrianised. The two current bus stations will be upgraded and improvements will be made to bus corridors and bus priority with the aim of increasing public transport usage by 30-40%. The new UTMC could reduce traffic volumes by directing drivers into free car parking spaces whilst giving bus priority at problem junctions. Work is beginning on three interconnected streets in the 'Ipswich Village' quarter to encourage more careful driving and greater pedestrian use. White lines, signs, double yellow lines and pedestrian guardrails will be removed and new lighting will be provided. The colour, texture and layout of the carriageway materials will emphasise the change in environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2460.065

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSurveyor magazineSame topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207