MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W82812161 · doi:10.5006/c2006-06193

Use of an Integrated CIPS/DCVG Survey in the ECDA Process

2006· article· en· W82812161 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUnion Gas (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)Process engineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The paper describes the theoretical and practical aspects of merging two indirect inspection tools (i.e. Close Interval Potential Survey and DC Voltage Gradient) in one integrated survey, as used in 2004 during an ECDA project covering more than 21 Km of gas pipelines in Southern Ontario. A method was developed and verified in the field to calculate the %IR at coating defects using the recorded data, with no need to interrupt the survey or to return to the defect location in order to measure the total gradient to remote earth. The data processing was improved by deriving the longitudinal gradient profile from the Close Interval Potential Survey data. This enhancement will be used in future surveys to validate indications, in conjunction with the measured lateral gradient data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207