MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W828199997

Towards a sustainable maintenance management of rural unpaved roads

2011· article· en· W828199997 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lionel J. Beaulieu, Pablo Pierre., Paule Poulin

Bibliographic record

Venue24th World Road CongressWorld Road Association (PIARC) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Order (exchange)Resource (disambiguation)Transport engineeringNatural resourceSustainable developmentEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementBusinessRisk analysis (engineering)Computer scienceEngineeringEnvironmental scienceGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Local roads and natural resource access roads represent a large proportion of the Canadian road network. Despite an often limited budget, unpaved road managers must have efficient and safe networks. In this context, the development of a decision support system to manage the maintenance of this type of roads is essential. Firstly, a major laboratory and field experimental program has been done to determine practical solutions for stabilization and dust suppressant treatment. Secondly, a life cycle analysis for maintenance of rural road networks is performed in order to quantify the environmental impact of these proposed practical solutions. Finally, a multi-criteria analysis that integrates environmental, social, logistical and technical dimensions is developed and incorporated to the decision support system. The sustainable management of unpaved rural road maintenance as presented in this article is the basis of an innovative way of thinking and managing this type of road networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue24th World Road CongressWorld Road Association (PIARC)Same topicAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationFrench-language works237,207