MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W828502818 · doi:10.3138/cjfs.23.1.2

From the Astonished Spectator to the Spectator in Movement: Exhibition Advertisements in 1920s Germany and Austria

2014· article· fr· W828502818 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael Cowan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtExhibitionArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lorsque les foires commerciales, phénomène nouveau et en voie de professionnalisation, se sont répandues après la première guerre mondiale dans des villes telles que Vienne, Francfort, Berlin et Düsseldorf, elles se sont souvent tournées vers le film comme moyen publicitaire, employant fréquemment des experts en animation ou des cinéastes d’avant-garde. En examinant les films publicitaires faits pour ces évènements, cet essai explore quelques unes des relations changeantes, dans les années 1920, entre le cinéma et la culture des foires commerciales. Les films adoptent souvent une stratégie de l’étonnement qui est commune à la publicité imprimée, aux expositions technologiques du 19ième siècle et au cinéma d’attraction des premiers temps. Mais, ils tendent aussi à illustrer un nouveau paradigme du film comme médium qui peut à la fois interpeler le spectateur et le contrôler. Cette idée du film comme moyen de direction du spectateur est en phase avec les nouvelles théories de la publicité qui sont apparues après la guerre et qui ont trouvé leur terrain d’essai précisément dans le milieu des foires commerciales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesSame topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207