MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W828771052

New Directions in Saskatchewan Public Policy/Remaining Loyal: Social Democracy in Quebec and Saskatchewan

2015· article· en· W828771052 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Eleanor D. Glor

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œinnovation journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Theory and Influence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemocracyPoliticsIdeologySocial Democratic PartyCommonwealthPolitical sciencePublic administrationSociologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

McGrane, David P. (Ed.). New Directions in Saskatchewan Public Policy. Regina, Canada: CPRC Press, University of Regina, 2011David McGrane Remaining Loyal: Democracy in Quebec and Saskatchewan Montreal & Kingston, London, Ithaca: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2014David McGrane is an associate professor of political studies at St. Thomas More College, University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon, Canada. Over course of three years, he published two books on Saskatchewan and Quebec (Canadian provinces) social democratic politics in (McGrane, 2011, 2014), a considerable accomplishment. This research on Saskatchewan and Quebec social democratic governments is important to students of public sector innovation because these provinces have often been most innovative in Canada (see also, for example, Glor, 1997, 2002 in which I identify 159 innovations of Saskatchewan government of 1971-82). This suggest ideology may be important to innovation.McGrane 's Remaining Loyal: Democracy in Quebec and Saskatchewan examines ideology of social democratic parties and governments in Quebec and Saskatchewan. He argues (1) that Saskatchewan Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) and its successor, New Democratic Party were and remain social democratic parties, and that Rassemblement pour l'independence nationale (RIN) from 1963 and Parti Quebecois (PQ) from 1968 in Quebec were and are social democratic parties (page 64), (2) that third way successors to traditional social democratic parties in Quebec and Saskatchewan are social democratic parties; and (3) that while Quebec's political culture may not be consistently social democratic, Saskatchewan's political culture has been, although this may be in process of changing (page 246). In making these assertions, McGrane takes on several of major controversies in Canadian and social democratic politics in Canada and internationally.McGrane's claims hinge on his definition of social democracy. He distinguishes between Fabian theory and that of Eduard Bernstein, a German who spent time with Fabians in United Kingdom. His first distinction is between Fabians' and Bernstein's definitions of social democracy. The key to this difference is his understanding of Fabians' sense of evolution in history as being inevitable, gradual and irreversible and Bernstein's as not being inevitable, nor as having a fixed, final goal. McGrane adopts latter perspective-social democracy is the implementation of a certain set of principles by a group of determined reformers whose specific goals vary by time and place (McGrane, 2014: 19)-and concludes Social democracy should not be seen as a fixed set of policies then, but rather a set of values (p. 206).1McGrane makes a second distinction between Fabians and Bernstein, namely, their approach to democracy and rights. The Fabians favour democracy because it is a mechanism to achieve socialist reforms, but Bernstein understands democracy as both means and end: it is means to achieve socialism and it is form in which socialism will be achieved. Bernstein's idea of democracy includes justice, defined as equality of rights including minority rights, and limits on rule of majority. He sees social democracy as heir to liberalism but as adopting a higher ideal, because it guarantees civil, social and economic democracy.Unlike in Europe, in Canada affiliation with labour movement was not very important (pages 29-30), nor was class politics in emergence of social democracy in Saskatchewan and Quebec. In fact, small farmers were a much more important political constituency in Saskatchewan. Even more important was development of social movements that provided an acceptable context and legitimacy for government intervention in economy after World War II. The economy, political institutions, and political agents were also important (page 165). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.008
Science and technology studies0.0120.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œinnovation journalSame topicPolitical Theory and InfluenceFrench-language works237,207