MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W828771052

New Directions in Saskatchewan Public Policy/Remaining Loyal: Social Democracy in Quebec and Saskatchewan

2015· article· en· W828771052 on OpenAlex
Eleanor D. Glor

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œinnovation journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Theory and Influence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemocracyPoliticsIdeologySocial Democratic PartyCommonwealthPolitical sciencePublic administrationSociologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

McGrane, David P. (Ed.). New Directions in Saskatchewan Public Policy. Regina, Canada: CPRC Press, University of Regina, 2011David McGrane Remaining Loyal: Democracy in Quebec and Saskatchewan Montreal & Kingston, London, Ithaca: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2014David McGrane is an associate professor of political studies at St. Thomas More College, University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon, Canada. Over course of three years, he published two books on Saskatchewan and Quebec (Canadian provinces) social democratic politics in (McGrane, 2011, 2014), a considerable accomplishment. This research on Saskatchewan and Quebec social democratic governments is important to students of public sector innovation because these provinces have often been most innovative in Canada (see also, for example, Glor, 1997, 2002 in which I identify 159 innovations of Saskatchewan government of 1971-82). This suggest ideology may be important to innovation.McGrane 's Remaining Loyal: Democracy in Quebec and Saskatchewan examines ideology of social democratic parties and governments in Quebec and Saskatchewan. He argues (1) that Saskatchewan Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) and its successor, New Democratic Party were and remain social democratic parties, and that Rassemblement pour l'independence nationale (RIN) from 1963 and Parti Quebecois (PQ) from 1968 in Quebec were and are social democratic parties (page 64), (2) that third way successors to traditional social democratic parties in Quebec and Saskatchewan are social democratic parties; and (3) that while Quebec's political culture may not be consistently social democratic, Saskatchewan's political culture has been, although this may be in process of changing (page 246). In making these assertions, McGrane takes on several of major controversies in Canadian and social democratic politics in Canada and internationally.McGrane's claims hinge on his definition of social democracy. He distinguishes between Fabian theory and that of Eduard Bernstein, a German who spent time with Fabians in United Kingdom. His first distinction is between Fabians' and Bernstein's definitions of social democracy. The key to this difference is his understanding of Fabians' sense of evolution in history as being inevitable, gradual and irreversible and Bernstein's as not being inevitable, nor as having a fixed, final goal. McGrane adopts latter perspective-social democracy is the implementation of a certain set of principles by a group of determined reformers whose specific goals vary by time and place (McGrane, 2014: 19)-and concludes Social democracy should not be seen as a fixed set of policies then, but rather a set of values (p. 206).1McGrane makes a second distinction between Fabians and Bernstein, namely, their approach to democracy and rights. The Fabians favour democracy because it is a mechanism to achieve socialist reforms, but Bernstein understands democracy as both means and end: it is means to achieve socialism and it is form in which socialism will be achieved. Bernstein's idea of democracy includes justice, defined as equality of rights including minority rights, and limits on rule of majority. He sees social democracy as heir to liberalism but as adopting a higher ideal, because it guarantees civil, social and economic democracy.Unlike in Europe, in Canada affiliation with labour movement was not very important (pages 29-30), nor was class politics in emergence of social democracy in Saskatchewan and Quebec. In fact, small farmers were a much more important political constituency in Saskatchewan. Even more important was development of social movements that provided an acceptable context and legitimacy for government intervention in economy after World War II. The economy, political institutions, and political agents were also important (page 165). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it