MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W829686143 · doi:10.5821/siiu.6083

El valor de la ciudad anónima

2014· article· es· W829686143 on OpenAlex
Laura María Giraldo Patiño

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVI Seminario Internacional de Investigación en Urbanismo, Barcelona-Bogotá, junio 2014 · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American Urban Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des Laurentides
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin AmericansPerspective (graphical)HumanitiesCharacterization (materials science)SociologyPolitical scienceComputer sciencePhilosophyArtificial intelligenceLawPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El estudio de la ciudad latinoamericana usualmente se hace desde sus problemáticas y no desde sus potencialidades. Este artículo sintetiza la tesina que bajo el mismo título pretende poner de relieve la particularidad de la ciudad anónima latinoamericana mediante la caracterización de sus componentes desde un enfoque positivo que permita formular estrategias para ponerla en valor dentro de su misma lógica. Studies about Latin American cities are usually carried out from standpoint of their issues, but not from their possibilities. This paper summarizes a broader research that aims to highlight the singularity of the anonymous city concept in Latin America by means of the characterization of its components. Such characterization is performed from a positive perspective that allows formulating strategies to vindicate the anonymous city within its own logic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.386
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.009
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it