MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W831010260

Introduction: Canadian Performances/global Redefinitions/ Introduction: Theatre Canadian et Redefinitions Planetaires

2013· article· en· W831010260 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Reid Gilbert, Marc Maufort

Bibliographic record

VenueTheatre Research in Canada · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Cultural and National Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobalizationPhenomenonCapitalismPolitical sciencePoliticsPolitical economyProtectionismCultural globalizationSociologyLawEconomicsMarket economyEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From last decades of twentieth century to present, new structures of globalization have increasingly characterized our world. From an economic point of view, influence of such institutional and regulatory structures as NAFTA and IMF has deeply affected relationships between countries on various continents. From a cultural perspective, internet and social media have contributed to quick knowledge dissemination across national boundaries and both a growing similarity among developed nations and an increasing sense of disenfranchisement in developing nations. As a fraught issue, globalization has generated new forms of critical discourse in various fields, including literature and theatre studies. While its advocates praise it for its ability to develop new connections between different world cultures, its detractors underscore its tendency to favour cultural sameness on a global scale. As Dan Rebellato reminds us, phenomenon of globalization can be understood in many ways. Already heralded by Karl Marx in nineteenth century as an inevitable process leading to productive dialogues between nations, globalization gained special significance towards end of twentieth century (Rebellato 14). Broadly speaking, globalization now designates manifold political, cultural, and economic exchanges between world's contemporary nation-states. This process stands in marked constrast to insularities of nineteenth century nationalisms (4-12). More specifically, Rebellato regards globalization as the rise of global capitalism operating under neoliberal policy conditions, by which he means non-protectionist economic conditions typical of late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries (12). Similarly, in this special issue, globalization is understood as a phenomenon closely linked with these recent phases of capitalism. The articles collected here foreground ways in which Canadian artists engaged in theatre and performance negotiate cross-cultural advantages and homogenizing pitfalls of such globalization. In 1827, Goethe already envisioned a concept he called Weltliteratur, a form of global literature transcending national boundaries. This notion, David Damrosch argues, foreshadowed our global modernity. In his What Is World Literature?, he redefines Goethe's Weltliteratur as a mode of circulation and of reading, which points to a network of literary works across nations (5). Damrosch's concept of refraction suggests that borrowed works of literature tell as much about host as about source culture (283). Refraction thus counterbalances homogenizing impact of globalization. Similarly, postcolonial scholar Gayatri Spivak critiques universalizing tendencies of globalization, setting it in opposition to her concept of planetarity, which emphasizes fruitful encounters with alterity (73). In a 2010 essay, Mariano Siskind likewise contrasts globalization to a renewed version of cosmopolitanism, embracing both local and global, as a way of truly engaging with literary production of other cultures. These notions of globalization naturally invite comparative studies of different cultures throughout world, both from literary and performance perspectives. Globalization has led to a welter of recent publications in fields of comparative literature and postcolonial studies, focusing mainly on prose and poetry. This yearning for an extended form of cosmopolitanism also characterizes theoretical studies of theatre and globalization. In theatre studies, globalization is related to issues of cross-cultural exhange, transnational influences, multiculturalism, and intercultural performance practices. As such, it has led to a number of significant publications, although perhaps to fewer than have appeared in comparative literature and postcolonial studies--a lacuna that this issue aspires to remedy, at least in Canadian context. In their important works, Dan Rebellato and Ric Knowles acknowledge that while globalization can potentially lead to meaningful interactions between cultures, it can also reveal forms of Eurocentric appropriations. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0120.006
Scholarly communication0.0110.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1270.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheatre Research in CanadaSame topicEuropean Cultural and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207