MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W831010260

Introduction: Canadian Performances/global Redefinitions/ Introduction: Theatre Canadian et Redefinitions Planetaires

2013· article· en· W831010260 on OpenAlex
Reid Gilbert, Marc Maufort

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTheatre Research in Canada · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Cultural and National Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobalizationPhenomenonCapitalismPolitical sciencePoliticsPolitical economyProtectionismCultural globalizationSociologyLawEconomicsMarket economyEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From last decades of twentieth century to present, new structures of globalization have increasingly characterized our world. From an economic point of view, influence of such institutional and regulatory structures as NAFTA and IMF has deeply affected relationships between countries on various continents. From a cultural perspective, internet and social media have contributed to quick knowledge dissemination across national boundaries and both a growing similarity among developed nations and an increasing sense of disenfranchisement in developing nations. As a fraught issue, globalization has generated new forms of critical discourse in various fields, including literature and theatre studies. While its advocates praise it for its ability to develop new connections between different world cultures, its detractors underscore its tendency to favour cultural sameness on a global scale. As Dan Rebellato reminds us, phenomenon of globalization can be understood in many ways. Already heralded by Karl Marx in nineteenth century as an inevitable process leading to productive dialogues between nations, globalization gained special significance towards end of twentieth century (Rebellato 14). Broadly speaking, globalization now designates manifold political, cultural, and economic exchanges between world's contemporary nation-states. This process stands in marked constrast to insularities of nineteenth century nationalisms (4-12). More specifically, Rebellato regards globalization as the rise of global capitalism operating under neoliberal policy conditions, by which he means non-protectionist economic conditions typical of late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries (12). Similarly, in this special issue, globalization is understood as a phenomenon closely linked with these recent phases of capitalism. The articles collected here foreground ways in which Canadian artists engaged in theatre and performance negotiate cross-cultural advantages and homogenizing pitfalls of such globalization. In 1827, Goethe already envisioned a concept he called Weltliteratur, a form of global literature transcending national boundaries. This notion, David Damrosch argues, foreshadowed our global modernity. In his What Is World Literature?, he redefines Goethe's Weltliteratur as a mode of circulation and of reading, which points to a network of literary works across nations (5). Damrosch's concept of refraction suggests that borrowed works of literature tell as much about host as about source culture (283). Refraction thus counterbalances homogenizing impact of globalization. Similarly, postcolonial scholar Gayatri Spivak critiques universalizing tendencies of globalization, setting it in opposition to her concept of planetarity, which emphasizes fruitful encounters with alterity (73). In a 2010 essay, Mariano Siskind likewise contrasts globalization to a renewed version of cosmopolitanism, embracing both local and global, as a way of truly engaging with literary production of other cultures. These notions of globalization naturally invite comparative studies of different cultures throughout world, both from literary and performance perspectives. Globalization has led to a welter of recent publications in fields of comparative literature and postcolonial studies, focusing mainly on prose and poetry. This yearning for an extended form of cosmopolitanism also characterizes theoretical studies of theatre and globalization. In theatre studies, globalization is related to issues of cross-cultural exhange, transnational influences, multiculturalism, and intercultural performance practices. As such, it has led to a number of significant publications, although perhaps to fewer than have appeared in comparative literature and postcolonial studies--a lacuna that this issue aspires to remedy, at least in Canadian context. In their important works, Dan Rebellato and Ric Knowles acknowledge that while globalization can potentially lead to meaningful interactions between cultures, it can also reveal forms of Eurocentric appropriations. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it