MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

L’aménagement du territoire entre l’ambition et le renoncement

2002· article· fr· W83217330 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Claude Manzagol

Bibliographic record

VenueInterventions économiques · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre de réadaptation Lethbridge-Layton-Mackay
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La métropolisation de l’économie contemporaine repose le problème des régions périphériques. Le renforcement croissant des liens entre les métropoles s’accompagne souvent d’un découplage entre la métropole et son hinterland. Depuis 25 ans, en France comme au Québec, le rôle de l’état dans l’aménagement du territoire a décliné, l’initiative passant aux régions et aux collectivités locales. L’état ne se reconnait plus les moyens et la légitimité d’une action directrice. Cet article examine quelques pistes à suivre pour éviter que s’étendent les territoires d’exclusion. La construction de milieux innovateurs, d’actifs relationnels, de réseaux de compétition-coopération ne sauraient exclure le jeu des nécessaires solidarités aux territoires non compétitifs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterventions économiquesSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207