MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W83289522 · doi:10.1580/06-weme-ci-061.1

A Mystery

2007· article· en· W83289522 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. Kathleen McCue

Bibliographic record

VenueWilderness and Environmental Medicine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant chemical constituents analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRashMedicineEmergency departmentDermatologyPhysical examinationPresentation (obstetrics)SurgeryBurn centerPoison controlMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An 11-year-old boy presented in July 2006 to a clinic in Dutch Harbor, AK, complaining of painful reddened areas of both forearms. There was no history of fever, trauma, joint pains, or muscle aches. The patient was not ill. He had never had any similar eruptions in the past. Physical examination was normal, except for the rash (Figures 1 and 2). The day prior to presentation he had helped to clear weeds near his family's home with some other children, who developed mildly reddened skin on their forearms.Figure 2Rash—photo by Annette Siemens, NP, Dutch Harbor, AK.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) What is the diagnosis? What is the clinical course? What is the pathophysiology? How is it treated? The patient's initial treatment consisted of ibuprofen, hydrocortisone 1% cream, and diphenhydramine. Three days after his initial presentation, he flew to Anchorage, AK, where he was seen in the Emergency Department (ED) of the Alaska Native Medical Center for worsening of the rash into tense, tender bullae (Figure 3). He still had no other symptoms. In the ED, the bullae were unroofed and dressed with silvadene cream and nonadhesive dressings. The patient was then referred to the surgical burn and wound care clinic and received physical therapy. He improved over the next several days with treatment consisting of Calmoseptine ointment and SAF-Gel hydrating dermal wound dressing with alginate. The areas of rash resolved slowly, much like a thermal burn, and remain hyperpigmented now, several months later. Cow parsnip (Figure 4) (Heracleum lanatum Michx.), also known as hogweed and wild celery, is a member of the Apiaceae family (carrots, celery, parsnips, fennel, dill, parsley, Queen Anne's lace). In many parts of Alaska, it is known by a local name, “pushkie.” It is found in woodland and meadow areas of Canada and Alaska, and as far south as Georgia and Arizona, at elevations of 1200–3000 m. Its tall hollow stems are 1–2.5 m tall, and its broad leaves may be 10–30 cm across. In late summer, it produces white flowers in large flat compound umbels 15–30 cm across.1.Silzer, Tanya. Heracleum lanatum Michx. Available at: http://www.usask.ca/agriculture/plantsci/classes/range/heracleum.html. Accessed September 19, 2006.Google Scholar Cow parsnip and many other plants produce furocoumarins to protect against fungal attack. It is these toxins that induce phytophotodermatitis, irritating the skin of susceptible people and causing blisters with exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation in the UV-A range. Furocoumarins are changed temporarily into a high-energy state when they absorb photons. They then release this energy into the skin where it causes damage to DNA in the epidermis, causing necrosis. Perspiration, wet skin, and high humidity increase the intensity of phototoxic reactions by increasing the skin's absorption of the furocoumarin. Phototoxicity causes severe reddening and varying degrees of blistering. In Alaska, this rash is often called “pushkie burns.” Most clinical changes occur within 24– 72 hours of exposure, but contaminated areas may remain photoreactive for a few months to many years and may produce permanent scarring. As little as 1 mg of furocoumarin per square centimeter of skin may cause blisters after an exposure to less than 10 minutes of summer sunlight. In case of a suspected phototoxic burn, stop contact with any plants suspected of being phototoxic and avoid sun exposure. Wash the exposed area thoroughly with water and a mild soap. Do not use bleach. For mild reactions, cool wet dressings, topical steroids, antihistamines, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories should suffice. Severe reactions may require high-dose systemic steroids. Consider topical 4% hydroquinone cream once to twice daily for several weeks to lessen hyperpigmentation. After recovery, topical sunscreens should be applied to affected skin surfaces when extended exposure to sunlight is expected.2.Zeller M.P. Beauty with a bite: Apicaceae (Umbelliferae), the carrot family.Regulatory Horticulture. 1999; 25: 10-13Google Scholar

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWilderness and Environmental MedicineSame topicPlant chemical constituents analysisFrench-language works237,207