MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W833742766

Canadian Action for Zero Nuclear Weapons

2010· article· en· W833742766 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNuclear Issues and Defense
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAction (physics)Nuclear weaponZero (linguistics)Political sciencePhysicsLawPhilosophyQuantum mechanicsLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

gone up.More nations have acquired these weapons.Testing has continued.Black market trade in nuclear secrets and nuclear materials abound [s].The technology to build a bomb has spread.Terrorists are determined to buy, build or steal one.Our efforts to contain these dangers are centered on a global non-proliferation regime, but as more people and nations break the rules, we could reach the point where the center cannot hold.[A]s the only nuclear power to have used a nuclear weapon, the United States has a moral responsibility to act.We cannot succeed in this endeavor alone, but we can lead it, we can start it.So today, I state clearly and with conviction America's commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons.I'm not naive.This goal will not be reached quicklyperhaps not in my lifetime.It will take patience and persistence.But now we, too, must ignore the voices who tell us that the world cannot change.We have to insist, 'Yes, we can.'" 3. Calls for achievement of a nuclear weapons-free world have continued to pour in from other quarters as well.In 2009, UN Secretary-General Ban Kimoon put his nuclear disarmament proposals in a broad context: "There can be no development without peace and no peace without development.Disarmament can provide the means for both.'We the peoples' have the legitimate right to challenge the leaders of the international community by asking these questions: What are you doing to eliminate nuclear weapons?How will you fund your fight against poverty?How will we finance mitigation of, and adaptation to, climate change and the protection of our environment?These are global goods that every government and every individual in the world should strive to achieve together in the spirit of renewed multilateralism.Disarmament can help lead the way to a renewed multilateralism and that is why I have made it a number one priority." 4.The historic UN Security Council Summit held September 24, 2009 added momentum to the drive for a nuclear weapons-free world.In their statements, heads of state embraced the objective of the elimination of nuclear weapons.Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama of Japan said, "The vision of a world without nuclear weapons proposed by President Obama this April has encouraged and inspired people around the world.It is high time for us to take action."Resolution 1887

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it