Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Ambient media and systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Treatment of 6H-1,2,4-oxadiazin-3(2H)-one-5(4H)-thione (2) with hydroxylamine, hydrazine, methylamine, or benzylamine afforded the corresponding N5-substituted 5-amino-6H-1,2,4-oxadiazin-3(2H)-ones 3c-f. Refluxing a dioxane solution of 6H-1,2,4-oxiazine-3,5(2H,4H)-dione (1) with benzylamine or aminodiphenylmethane and hexamethyldisilazane in the presence of ammonium sulfate gave 5-benzylamino-6H-1,2,4-oxadiazin-3(2H)-one (3f) and the corresponding 5-diphenylmethylamino derivative 3g. Reaction of 1 with methyl iodide, benzyl chloride, dihydropyran, dihydrofuran, or benzyloxycarbonyl chloride afforded the corresponding 2-substituted 6H-1,2,4-oxadiazine-3,5(2H,4H)-diones 6a-e. Reaction of 2-methyl-6H-1,2,4-oxadiazine-3,5(2H,4H)-dione (6a) or the corresponding 2-benzyl derivative 6b with phosphorus pentasulfide in dioxane gave 2-methyl-6H-1,2,4-oxadiazin-3(2H)-one-5(4H)-thione (8a) and the corresponding 2-benzyl derivative 8b, respectively. Reaction of 8a with ammonia in dioxane afforded 2-methyl-5-amino-6H-1,2,4-oxadiazin-3(2H)-one (9). The degree of in vitro activity and the presence of antibacterial activity in the urine of animals given 5-amino-6H-1,2,4-oxadiazin-3(2H)-one (3a) by oral route of administration prompted selection of this compound for further study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it