MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W833984200 · doi:10.1139/o08-123

Forces and torques in the nucleus: chromatin under mechanical constraintsThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled 29th Annual International Asilomar Chromatin and Chromosomes Conference, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

2009· review· en· W833984200 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Christophe Lavelle

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromatinBiologyDNAComputational biologyCell biologyChromatin remodelingScaffold/matrix attachment regionHistone-modifying enzymesPhysicsGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genomic DNA in eukaryotic cells is organized in discrete chromosome territories, each consisting of a single huge hierarchically supercoiled nucleosomal fiber. Through dynamic changes in structure, resulting from chemical modifications and mechanical constraints imposed by numerous factors in vivo, chromatin plays a critical role in the regulation of DNA metabolism processes, including replication and transcription. Indeed, DNA-translocating enzymes, such as polymerases, produce physical constraints that chromatin has to overcome. Recent techniques, in particular single-molecule micromanipulation, have allowed precise quantization of forces and torques at work in the nucleus and have greatly improved our understanding of chromatin behavior under physiological mechanical constraints. These new biophysical approaches should enable us to build realistic mechanistic models and progressively specify the ad hoc and hazy "because of chromatin structure" argument often used to interpret experimental studies of biological function in the context of chromatin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsFrench-language works237,207