El Museo de la Civilización de Quebec: la cultura como componente central del desarrollo sostenible
Bibliographic record
Abstract
development poses the question of the limits of development of contemporary societies and, consequently, of the functioning of their institutions. is an interested party in the development of society, whether in its economic, social or territorial aspects. To wish to introduce an economic, social or environmental project without bearing in mind the culture of the participants is a guarantee of failure (Cote, 2011: 24). is a way of thinking and acting, as well as a door open to our roots and the world. Rather than invoking the end of museums in the name of sustainable development or the complete opposite, what we should be asking ourselves is whether this can be a cohesive framework of action. The example of the Museum of Civilization's Sustainable Development Action Plan and the experience of its involvement in the drafting of the first Agenda 21 for Culture to be adopted by a government will enable us to reflect on the passage from the museum as actor to the museum as creator, on the place of culture in the contemporary world and, finally, on the integration of the paradoxes of society as a cultural norm addressed to the renewal of ideas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".