MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W83752750 · doi:10.1155/2006/539345

Liver Transplantation for Cirrhosis in Cystic Fibrosis

2006· article· en· W83752750 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Thierry Lamireau, Steven R. Martin, Michel Lallier, JE Marcotte, Fernando Álvarez

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCystic fibrosisCirrhosisLiver transplantationTransplantationPortal hypertensionComplicationGastroenterologyAscitesInternal medicineLiver functionRefractory (planetary science)Pulmonary function testingLung transplantationSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Liver disease is the third most common cause of death in children with cystic fibrosis (CF). Liver transplantation is an effective treatment in children with hepatic failure. AIMS: The objective of the present study was to review the indications and postoperative course of hepatic transplantation in a cystic fibrosis population. PATIENTS: Five children with CF, at a mean age of 16.5 years, underwent liver transplantation. RESULTS: All patients showed cirrhosis, portal hypertension and hepatic failure. The main postoperative complication was ascites refractory to treatment in two patients. No significant deterioration of the pulmonary function was noted. Two patients died, one of Hodgkin lymphoma and the other of progressive pulmonary failure. CONCLUSION: Liver transplantation was indicated in children with CF when hepatic failure and/or severe portal hypertension was present with well-preserved pulmonary function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of GastroenterologySame topicOrgan Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207