MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W837892973 · doi:10.5206/cie-eci.v39i1.9146

Learning to Become Lifelong Global Citizens

2010· article· en· W837892973 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Soveacha Ros

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative and International Education · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticulturalismSociologyLifelong learningContext (archaeology)PedagogyGraduate studentsLibrary scienceGender studiesHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines transition practices of four international male graduate students from Cambodia pursuing social science degrees at Northern Illinois University (NIU). An interview guide was designed and grounded in three questions: (1) How do informants describe their academic and social experiences during their first year at NIU?; (2) What adaptation resources do they have at their disposal (i.e. on NIU campus, in DeKalb and neighbouring communities, social networks in Cambodia and America)? How do these resources help them to adjust; (3) How do they view themselves as international students at NIU? And, how does this view play a role in their adaptation process? The analysis is drawn upon four individual in-depth interviews. Two informants have been at NIU since August 2006 referred to as Senior 1 and Senior 2. The other two participants have been at NIU since August 2007and are referred to as Junior 1 and Junior 2. Excerpts of critical markers accumulated from interviews are employed to emphasize key themes in the data. Implications for teaching and learning in multicultural education context and literature dealing with similar groups of students from South East Asia are also discussed. Le but de cet article est d’examiner les pratiques d’adaptation de quatre étudiants internationaux de troisième cycle, originaires du Cambodge et qui étudient à la faculté de Sciences de l’Université d’ Illinois du Nord (UIN). Nous avons mis en place un guide pour les interviews où nous les avons interrogés sur les trois questions suivantes: (1) Comment nos informateurs décrivent-ils leurs expériences académiques et sociales pendant leur première année à UIN ? ; (2) À quelles ressources d’adaptation ont-ils accès (par exemple sur le campus de l’UIN, à DeKalb et dans le voisinage, dans leurs réseaux de relations sociales au Cambodge et aux États-Unis) ? Comment ces ressources leurs servent-elles à s’adapter ? ; (3) Comment se perçoivent-ils eux-mêmes en tant qu’étudiants internationaux à UIN ? Et quel rôle joue cette perception dans leur processus d’adaptation ? Cette analyse puise dans les interviews de ces quatre individus. Deux informateurs sont à la UIN depuis août 2006. Nous nous réfèrerons à eux avec les mots anglais Senior 1 et Senior 2. Les autres deux participants sont à la UIN depuis août 2007. Nous nous réfèrerons à eux avec les mots anglais Junior 1 et Junior 2. Nous utiliserons des références critiques de quelques extraits des interviews afin de mettre l’accent sur des thèmes clés dans les données. Pour conclure, nous examinerons les implications pour l’enseignement et l’apprentissage dans des contextes éducatifs multi culturaux et analyserons les résultats d’autres recherches avec des groupes d’étudiants similaires, originaires de l’Asie du Sud Est.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.619
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.179
GPT teacher head0.523
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComparative and International EducationSame topicInnovative Teaching Methodologies in Social SciencesFrench-language works237,207