Arnould's Law of Marine Insurance, 17th Edition, 1st Supplement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Optimal treatment of bacterial meningitis raises three questions: which antibiotic? which dosage? which duration? The overall duration of antibiotherapy has been shortened since the last decade. If a short-course treatment shows similar efficacy and rate of relapse, unnecessary prolonged course of treatment exposes to increased cost, duration of hospitalization and secondary effects. From 1979, Gold et al in Toronto treated all uncomplicated cases of meningitis for seven days and obtained satisfactory results. The first randomized trials evaluating optimal duration of treatment in meningitis were performed in 1985 by Lin et al: they showed no difference in terms of efficacy and complications between conventional and short-term treatment. Current rules in meningococcal meningitis consist of seven days or less on therapy, and 7-10 days for pneumococcal or Haemophilus meningitis. The sequential follow-up of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels seems a useful tool for the management of bacterial meningitis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".