MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W840149091

Phantom Past, Indigenous Presence: Native Ghosts in North American Culture & History ed. by Colleen E. Boyd, Coll Thrush (review)

2014· article· en· W840149091 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yvonne J. Milspaw

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of American Folklore · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousHistoryNative americanTrope (literature)AnthropologyFrontierEthnologySociologyArt historyArtArchaeologyLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phantom Past, Indigenous Presence: Native Ghosts in North American Culture & History. Ed. and Introduction by Colleen E. Boyd and Coll Thrush. (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2011. Pp. xl + 360, acknowledgments, illustrations, contributors, index.)Native an inescapable part of American landscape. They remind us of a not so distant past when land we call ours re- ally belonged to others, from whom it was taken by not altogether fair means. That past haunts us, and specter of indigenous as a memory of past injustice marks landscape and our experience of it. This is premise of book Phantom Past, Indigenous Presence: Native Ghosts in North American Culture & His- tory. The authors and editors North Amer- ican anthropologists, historians, and literary scholars, and they each address notion of a haunted landscape from perspectives of their own disciplines. The result is a fascinating collection of essays addressing ghost lore from a variety of approaches, some of which will be of great interest to folklorists.The 10 essays arranged in three sections: Methodologies (including two good literary analyses), Historical Encounters, and The Past in Present. Several of authors live on West Coast-Seattle and Vancouver-and work with vibrant Indigenous communities there, which enables them to compare imagined past and present from insider viewpoints.The introduction by editors Boyd and Thrush sets theoretical parameters of collection with their statement that native have shaped and informed colonizing encounters [becoming a] powerful trope of terror and la- ment (pp. viii-ix). They suggest that stories of Indigenous fill several functions: they express moral anxieties about displacement of native peoples, they harness real Indigenous beliefs about power and potency of dead which in turn cast as 'irrational' superstition which must give way to 'rational progress,' and finally stories disrupt dominant and official historical narrative (p. ix). The authors also routinely call on Freud's immensely useful idea of unheimlich, uncanny-a concept folklorists have somehow generally overlooked. A theme that consistently emerges from all of essays is way that the histories of actual Indigenous peoples routinely displaced... by narratives of ghosts (p. xxv).While there many good essays in this collection, several of them outstanding; they will be of special interest to folklorists. Michelle Burnham's essay on Sherman Alexie's Killer as Indigenous Gothic was informed both by literary analysis and a sensitivity to issues affecting native peoples. Burnham calls on con- temporary literary theory, theories of Gothic, and Freud's notion of uncanny to produce a thoughtful, radical, and enormously useful reading of Alexie's sometimes disturbing novel.Coll Thrush's essay on Hauntings as Histo- ries: Indigenous Ghosts and Urban Past in Seattle is excellent. A historian, Thrush is also an outstanding writer. His essay insightfully uses stories of to map his- torical presence of Indigenous people just be- neath surface of modern Seattle. He writes of examining ghost story as a place-based methodology in which hauntings gesture to- ward salient conflicts and patterns in history of conquest. A ghost, in effect, is a place's past speaking to its-and our-present (p. 58). He uncovers a geography of Seattle's ghosts that is largely congruent with Indigenous ge- ographies that predated city primarily near places where Indigenous presence was most dense and storied (p. 62). He draws from stories a pattern where used as markers of urban disorder-poverty and prostitution (p. 66). In compelling ways, they help us to make sense of past. Indian ghosts, he claims, are not so much metaphors drawn from imaginary of conquest as they metonyms for actual material processes by which that conquest took place (p. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of American FolkloreSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207