MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W840931598

RJS PROVIDE LIFT TO RECOVERY : US AIRWAYS EXPRESS WILL PLAY A MAJOR ROLE IN ITS PARENT'S REVIVAL

2003· article· en· W840931598 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sandra Arnoult

Bibliographic record

VenueAir transport world · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicAviation Industry Analysis and Trends
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubsidiaryBusinessBankruptcyPrestigeAviationMarketingFinanceEngineeringMultinational corporation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At the heart of US Airways plan to recover from bankruptcy is its daughter company, US Airways Express. With a network of 11 Regional Airlines that includes wholly owned subsidiaries PSA, Allegheny and Piedmont, Express operates more than 200 daily flights to 152 airports in the US, Canada and the Bahamas. Experts say this emphasis on regional flights is in step with the airline formula of the future: if foreign ownership restrictions are removed, major carriers will focus their attentions on international markets. Domestic markets, then, will consist primarily of low-fare regional carriers like US Airways Express. At the cockpits of these regional jets will be a large number of furloughed mainline pilots participating in Jets for Jobs, a program intended to soften the blow to the furloughed pilots by pairing them with these regional services. Although there have been complaints about the pilots' step down in pay and prestige, US Airways defends the program, saying that without it, a large number of pilots would lose their jobs altogether. US Airways Express provides a way for its parent company to regain footing, and Jobs for Jets offers jobs to pilots who would otherwise be displaced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1210.051

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAir transport worldSame topicAviation Industry Analysis and TrendsFrench-language works237,207