MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W841141218 · doi:10.1163/9789004265233_005

3. Enthusiasm and Co-operation

2014· book-chapter· en· W841141218 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Simon Kitson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnthusiasmHEROPower (physics)DissentPoliticsPolitical scienceGovernment (linguistics)World War IILawHistoryArtPsychologyLiteraturePhilosophySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

'Vichy' was directed first by the First World War hero Philippe Petain, coupled with the scheming parliamentarian Pierre Laval. Then after the end of 1940 power would pass to Petain and the opportunistic naval admiral Francois Darlan. Finally, Laval would return in April 1942 when Petain was relegated to a largely symbolic role. Few voices of dissent were raised in the Police when the Vichy regime first came to power. Vichy was not only considered as legitimate but, even amongst formerly Republican Policemen, many actually welcomed its arrival in power. If this position would seem an unlikely descendent of the political stance adopted by the Marseille Police at the end of the 1930s several explanations must be invoked. Vichy's ability to draw on a reliable Police force was encouraged by the ambition of Policemen, both personal and professional.Keywords: France; Marseille; Philippe Petain; Police; Vichy Government

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.008
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies→French-language works237,207→