MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PARTIAL AND TOTAL COLUMN SFIT2 RETRIEVALS FROM DA8 AND PARIS-IR FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTRA RECORDED OVER CANADIAN ARCTIC IN THE SPRING OF 2004-5, INCLUDING COMPARISONS WITH ACE SATELLITE MEASUREMENTS

2007· article· en· W843092 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Keeyoon Sung, Kaley A. Walker, J. R. Drummond, Dejian Fu, P. F. Bernath, R. L. Mittermeier, H. Fast, Kimberly Strong

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeorge (robot)Spring (device)GeographySatelliteArcticArchaeologyEnvironmental scienceForestryPhysical geographyOceanographyEngineeringGeologyArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Author Institution: Dept. of Physics, University of Toronto, 60 St. George St., Toronto, ON., M5S 1A7, CANADA; Dept. of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W., ON., N2L 3G1, CANADA; ARQX, Environment Canada, 4905 Dufferin Street, DOWNSVIEW, ON., M3H 5T4, CANADA; Dept. of Physics, University of Toronto, 60 St. George St., Toronto, ON., M5S 1A7, CANADA

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Biochemistry and BiophysicsSame topicCultural Heritage Materials AnalysisFrench-language works237,207