MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W843309327

Analytical Modelling of Isotype Heterojunctions

2013· dissertation· en· W843309327 on OpenAlexfundno aff
M. Gil

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsIsotypeImmunologyBiologyAntibody
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An isotype heterojunction is a junction between two layers of dissimilar semiconductors both of which are doped either n-type or p-type. These semiconductor structures are found in a variety of optoelectronic devices, such as solar cells, semiconductor lasers, and detectors. Motivated by the structure of third generation inorganic solar cells, this thesis concentrates on the analytical modelling of isotype heterojunctions and its application to the design optimization of these devices. The main development of this work is the introduction of an analytical expression for the current density across an isotype heterojunction valid for arbitrary doping concentration ratios. This result generalizes the standard expression found in the literature, which is limited by the assumption that the doping concentration ratio between the two sides of the heterojunction is equal to one. The generalization is developed by employing the Lambert W function in the solution of the electrostatic boundary condition associated with the heterojunction interface. As done in the derivation of the standard expression found in the literature, the generalization only considers thermionic emission, but the same method can readily be applied for other transport mechanisms. A key feature of this generalized result is that it mathematically contains the expression for the current density across a metal-semiconductor Schottky contact as a limiting case, thereby unifying the treatment of these two heterointerfaces into a single general analytical description. This latter find is particularly significant from a theoretical perspective, considering that the two heterointerfaces are traditionally described as separate topics in the presentation of semiconductor device theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207