Reconfiguración de lo político en la gestión de desastres: un análisis de la “crisis de granizo” en Quebec (1998)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este articulo propone un analisis de las interacciones entre los Estados y las sociedades postindustriales en un contexto de gestion de crisis natural. Esta fundado en los conceptos de sociedad del riesgo (BECK, 2001) y de democracia dialogica (CALLON & al., 2001), estudiamos una controversia tecno-cientifi ca en Quebec derivada de la “Crisis de granizo” (1998). Incluso si se supone que los ciudadanos desempenan un rol esencial en el proceso de reconfi guracion de la politica en las democracias avanzadas, este rol es aun insufi ciente y ello, porque el Estado resulto efi caz en la gestion de dicha crisis. Concluimos que dicho analisis permite destacar los desafios sociopoliticos principales y los cuestionamientos relativos a la legitimidad del Estado contemporaneo en la gestion de las crisis naturales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".