MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W846996841

Le Mois De la Photo a Montreal: September 5-October 5, 2013

2014· article· en· W846996841 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rachel Somerstein

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative technology transfer and society · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhotography and Visual Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionArt historyVisual artsArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

If for much of the twentieth century photographs' has been, at its core, about the decisive moment, the thirteenth installment of Le Nlois de la Photo a Montreal suggests that the met hum is moving in new directions. The traditional photographic still was rare in this iteration of the biennial, thoughtfully curated by Paul Wombell and titled Drone: The Automated Image. Instead, the exhibition, comprising work by some twenty-five Quebecois and international artists installed in fourteen sites throughout the city, privileged the mechanism of picture-making (endoscope, large-format scanner, robotic dog) and the digital and mechanical sources of those images (intercepted (In cue footage, Google Street View, and social media). This zeal for technology recalled the publicly celebrated, rapid technological changes of the turn of the last century, when electric lights at the Paris (1889 and Chicago (1893) Expositions sent revelers agog, exposing new ways of seeing. In a similar vein, this show's surfeit of opportunities to extend human vision revealed ecosystems. altitudes, and planes of seeing oni recently accessible to the human eye. In Michael Wesely's photographs. time was one of those unseeable regimes made plain. For each of his photographs. Wesely kept his camera shutter open for nearly two years. Taken mostly in Berlin in the late 1990s, these scenes reveal the passage of tina* by showing the changing skyline, the skeletons of cranes. the rise of new buildings, and the disappearance of others. Beams of sunlight, the residue of the ever-changing positions (tithe earth and sun, are also evident, like a palimpsest of seasons. These shifls and changes are the more pronounced given that some structures, like the trees in Aisdanter Phaz, (27.3.1997 13.12.1998) 0997- -98), remain unchanged. Wesely's photographs are at once strikingly energetic and ghostly and uninhabited. This formal paradox aptly describes Berlin, which had only been unified for ten years at the time the images were taken. In that way, the photographs offer a larger commentary on time's passage. depicting the desire to build anew while also preserving the city's many layers of' (painfuL history--a dialectical tension fundamental to the city's fabric where portions of' the East Side Gallery, the longest freestanding area of the Berlin Wall, were recently torn down--amid protest--to build luxury condominiums. Panoramic seeing was another theme here, specifically aerial, distant points of' view that require technology to furnish their perspectives. These views, like Trevor Paglen's drone footage (intercepted by an amateur satellite hacket-and Thomas Ruff's images of Mars's crust, are fundamentally beyond the human scale. Similarly, Raphael Dallaporta's series Ruins (Season 1) (2011) showed aerial views of Afghanistan stitched together from hundreds of digital photographs that archeologists used to locate ancient sites, such as a citadel from the Achaemenid period (roughly 550 to 330 B.C.). Although conceptually compelling, these pieces were not as visually arresting as some of the other work on view', perhaps given that satellitic viewing, as Lisa Parks puts it in her masterful! Cultures in Orbit (2005), has become awell-known televisual trope. Thus, more compelling than these photographs was the story--told through related ephemera--of Dallaporta's lost drone, which the artist had purchased for less than seven thousand dollars and kit ted out with a camera. Dallaporta's downed drone was ultimately found and returned, memory card intact; as in a scene from the theater of the absurd, a second Downed drone. which belonged not to Dallaporta but to the German government, also turned up during his search. Custom-built drone cameras also opened up otherwise inaccessible perspectives of the natural world. For her video installation From Here to There (2003), Jona sterbak affixed a lightweight camera to a Jack Russell terrier named Stanley, and then took him on a voyage by car, ferry, and foot to a wintry cottage. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5830.192

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComparative technology transfer and societySame topicPhotography and Visual CultureFrench-language works237,207