MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W846996841

Le Mois De la Photo a Montreal: September 5-October 5, 2013

2014· article· en· W846996841 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueComparative technology transfer and society · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePhotography and Visual Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésExhibitionArt historyVisual artsArt
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

If for much of the twentieth century photographs' has been, at its core, about the decisive moment, the thirteenth installment of Le Nlois de la Photo a Montreal suggests that the met hum is moving in new directions. The traditional photographic still was rare in this iteration of the biennial, thoughtfully curated by Paul Wombell and titled Drone: The Automated Image. Instead, the exhibition, comprising work by some twenty-five Quebecois and international artists installed in fourteen sites throughout the city, privileged the mechanism of picture-making (endoscope, large-format scanner, robotic dog) and the digital and mechanical sources of those images (intercepted (In cue footage, Google Street View, and social media). This zeal for technology recalled the publicly celebrated, rapid technological changes of the turn of the last century, when electric lights at the Paris (1889 and Chicago (1893) Expositions sent revelers agog, exposing new ways of seeing. In a similar vein, this show's surfeit of opportunities to extend human vision revealed ecosystems. altitudes, and planes of seeing oni recently accessible to the human eye. In Michael Wesely's photographs. time was one of those unseeable regimes made plain. For each of his photographs. Wesely kept his camera shutter open for nearly two years. Taken mostly in Berlin in the late 1990s, these scenes reveal the passage of tina* by showing the changing skyline, the skeletons of cranes. the rise of new buildings, and the disappearance of others. Beams of sunlight, the residue of the ever-changing positions (tithe earth and sun, are also evident, like a palimpsest of seasons. These shifls and changes are the more pronounced given that some structures, like the trees in Aisdanter Phaz, (27.3.1997 13.12.1998) 0997- -98), remain unchanged. Wesely's photographs are at once strikingly energetic and ghostly and uninhabited. This formal paradox aptly describes Berlin, which had only been unified for ten years at the time the images were taken. In that way, the photographs offer a larger commentary on time's passage. depicting the desire to build anew while also preserving the city's many layers of' (painfuL history--a dialectical tension fundamental to the city's fabric where portions of' the East Side Gallery, the longest freestanding area of the Berlin Wall, were recently torn down--amid protest--to build luxury condominiums. Panoramic seeing was another theme here, specifically aerial, distant points of' view that require technology to furnish their perspectives. These views, like Trevor Paglen's drone footage (intercepted by an amateur satellite hacket-and Thomas Ruff's images of Mars's crust, are fundamentally beyond the human scale. Similarly, Raphael Dallaporta's series Ruins (Season 1) (2011) showed aerial views of Afghanistan stitched together from hundreds of digital photographs that archeologists used to locate ancient sites, such as a citadel from the Achaemenid period (roughly 550 to 330 B.C.). Although conceptually compelling, these pieces were not as visually arresting as some of the other work on view', perhaps given that satellitic viewing, as Lisa Parks puts it in her masterful! Cultures in Orbit (2005), has become awell-known televisual trope. Thus, more compelling than these photographs was the story--told through related ephemera--of Dallaporta's lost drone, which the artist had purchased for less than seven thousand dollars and kit ted out with a camera. Dallaporta's downed drone was ultimately found and returned, memory card intact; as in a scene from the theater of the absurd, a second Downed drone. which belonged not to Dallaporta but to the German government, also turned up during his search. Custom-built drone cameras also opened up otherwise inaccessible perspectives of the natural world. For her video installation From Here to There (2003), Jona sterbak affixed a lightweight camera to a Jack Russell terrier named Stanley, and then took him on a voyage by car, ferry, and foot to a wintry cottage. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,854
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,592

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,263
Écart entre enseignants0,244 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle