MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W84927295

Manuel Barba y Roca (1752-1824), un agrónomo ilustrado en la España del siglo XVIII

2004· article· es· W84927295 on OpenAlex
Pasqual Bernat López

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLlull: Revista de la Sociedad Española de Historia de las Ciencias y de las Técnicas · 2004
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical and socio-economic studies of Spain and related regions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyContext (archaeology)Quarter (Canadian coin)EnlightenmentHumanitiesPoliticsPolitical scienceArtHistoryArchaeologyPhilosophyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this article is to give a biographical picture of Manuel Barba y Roca, a lawyer from Vilafranca del Penedes (Barcelona), who lived during the second half of the 18th and the first quarter of the 19th century. This is the period in which the Enlightenment Movement in Spain reached its peak and declined. Using this as a starting point, this article tries to establish connections between Barba y Roca's life and the ideological, political, economical and social circumstances of his time. In this context, it is intended to highlight his interest in agronomy and give emphasis to his ideas on agricultural science and technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it