Sustainable Transportation Legacy of the 2010 Olympic Winter Games
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In response to local sustainability policies and the International Olympic Committee’s (IOC) recognition in the importance of the environment and sustainable development in sports, a before-and-during monitoring study was conducted for the 2010 Olympic Winter Games held in British Columbia, Canada. The monitoring study comprised of a screenline survey to account for person-trips entering and exiting the City of Vancouver’s Downtown core in various modes. An intercept survey was also conducted at various Olympic Games venues and celebration sites to gather data on the travel patterns of spectators and event attendees. A key result of the study revealed a 61% share of sustainable modes during the Games, up 18% from a pre-Games mode share of 43%, underscoring an overall achievement of the transportation goals of the 2010 Olympic Winter Games. The resulting travel behaviour documented is a legacy of sustainable transportation from the 2010 Olympic Winter Games, and evidence that mega-events can be a vehicle for change to positively shape urban form and encourage sustainable transportation behaviour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it