MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

El cooperativismo en Madrid. Situación presente y perspectivas legislativas

2011· article· es· W84981764 on OpenAlexaff
Santiago Carballo Quiroga

Bibliographic record

VenueBoletín de la Asociación Internacional de Derecho Cooperativo · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCooperative Studies and Economics
Canadian institutionsPlentyoffish Media (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En el periodo 1996-2009 se han constituido 2.112 cooperativas, de las cuales 1.087 son de viviendas y 916 de trabajo asociado. En las cifras de trabajo asociado se observa la incidencia que tuvo la Ley de Sociedades Laborales de 1997 que permitió crear sociedades limitadas laborales, efecto levemente neutralizado por la rebaja de 5 a 3 en el número mínimo de socios según la ley madrileña. Ha habido una preferencia mayoritaria por el modelo de sociedad laboral frente al modelo cooperativo. En contra del modelo cooperativo ha incidido la dispersión normativa con quince leyes autonómicas y una nacional. Sería conveniente una legislación cooperativa más sencilla. La acomodación de las sociedades laborales a la nueva Ley de Economía Social requeriría la reforma de la Ley de Sociedades Laborales. La experiencia acumulada y los nuevos problemas hacen necesaria la modificación de la Ley. Recibido: 17.05.11 Aceptado: 28.06.11

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBoletín de la Asociación Internacional de Derecho CooperativoSame topicCooperative Studies and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207