MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Low Frequency Science with the Square Kilometre Array

2002· article· en· W850275 on OpenAlexaff
A. R. Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueSymposium - International Astronomical Union · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsReionizationRedshiftAstronomyGalaxyRadio telescopeAstrophysicsTelescopeStarsSpectral resolutionRadio astronomyUniverseGalactic astronomyAngular resolution (graph drawing)Star formationMilky WaySpectral line

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past several years an international community of scientists and engineers has emerged with a common goal to solve the technical challenge required to construct a giant radio telescope with a collecting area of one square kilometre. The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) will have a hundred times more collecting area than our most powerful existing radio telescopes, providing sensitivity of a few tens of nanoJy in the centimetre/decimetre wavelength continuum. With a spatial resolution better than the Hubble Space Telescope, a field of view larger than the full moon, and the ability to simultaneously image a wide range of red shift, the SKA will be the worlds premier spectroscopic imaging telescope at any waveband. At long wavelengths the SKA will be able to detect emission from atomic hydrogen gas at extreme redshifts, allowing study of the “Dark Ages” of the Universe, before, and during, the transition phase when the initial stars formed and reionization occurred. The combination of sensitivity, wide field of view and high angular resolution, will allow high resolution imaging of the interstellar media and magnetic field of a vast number of galaxies to high redshift. Measurements of atomic hydrogen emission and continuum emission will trace the star formation history of the Universe from primordial galaxies to the present.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSymposium - International Astronomical UnionSame topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207