MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W852966581

Três abordagens sobre os estudos críticos do discurso no teste da dominação

2013· article· pt· W852966581 on OpenAlexaff
David Alberto Londoño Vásquez, Héctor Leonel Bermúdez-Restrepo

Bibliographic record

VenueIntellectum (Universidad de La Sabana) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, Identity, and Education in Brazil
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article shows the usefulness of a theoretical and methodological accumulation of three approaches to critical studies of discourse in a possible sociological examination of domination: the historical discursive method, textually-oriented discourse analysis and social-cognitive studies. The example underlying the article is the domination that can appear in contemporary administrative discourse, which could be clarified precisely through input from the aforementioned approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntellectum (Universidad de La Sabana)Same topicRace, Identity, and Education in BrazilFrench-language works237,207