MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adaptation of an internet‐based DICOM viewer for use with the Medical Imaging Resource Center – Teaching File System (MIRC‐TFS)

2015· article· en· W853418926 on OpenAlexaff
Yasmin Carter, Adam McKenzie, John Costa, Brent Burbridge

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiology practices and education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDICOMComputer sciencePlug-inThe InternetMultimediaLoginImage file formatsFile formatWorld Wide WebDatabaseArtificial intelligenceOperating systemImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DICOM is the standard file format for medical imaging; however, storage, transmission and viewing of these images over the internet for teaching and learning purposes outside of the clinical setting presents a challenge as they do not lend themselves well to rapid display and interrogation due to their atypical file format. The aim of this project was to utilize the web technology standard HTML 5 offers to deploy a DICOM viewer that functions well, directly in the user's browser, without the need for complex client side‐applications, application switching, or user login requirements. To achieve this we have adapted the open source HTML 5 DICOM viewer, Oviyam, for integration with the Radiological Society of North America's Medical Imaging Resource Center – Teaching File System (MIRC‐TFS) on a virtual server to facilitate access to DICOM objects for teaching and learning. For learners a plugin was developed to transform the DICOM images in MIRC‐TFS into JPEG format resulting in a reduction in file size allowing users to view the images more rapidly while supporting higher user traffic for viewing images concurrently, as frequently occurs with large class sizes. In addition, a second plugin was developed for BlackBoard Learn that allows instructors to browse the MIRC‐TFS teaching cases and insert them alongside their other course materials. The tool set and image viewing capabilities of Oviyam were enhanced to include annotation tools allowing students to create marked up versions of the images for evaluation of their knowledge. The deployment of this solution has significantly facilitated the interaction of teachers and learners with DICOM based images for use in their academic environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicRadiology practices and educationFrench-language works237,207