Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to evaluate risk factors for germ cell cancers, we conducted a case-control study of 510 men with testicular cancer aged 15 to 79 years and 996 randomly selected age-matched controls in the provinces of British Columbia and Alberta, Canada. Subjects completed a mailed questionnaire providing data on education level, ethnic origin, medical history, smoking, occupation, and recreational and sports activity. The response rate among cases was 80.3 percent and among controls was 68.1 percent. After controlling for age and ethnic origin, undescended testis was associated positively with risk of testicular cancer (odds ratio [OR] = 3.5; 95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 2.2-5.7) as was inguinal hernia requiring surgery (OR = 2.0, CI = 1.3-2.9), and hydrocoele (OR = 2.6, CI = 1.4-5.1). Risk of testicular cancer increased with height, with subjects taller than 180 cm having a significantly increased risk compared with those 174 cm or less (OR = 1.5, CI = 1.1-2.1). A moderate to high level of recreational activity level was associated inversely with testicular cancer risk (OR = 0.6, CI = 0.5-0.8).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".