MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W855910777

Лексема "oblivion”: развитие семантики в правовых текстах Канады

2015· article· ru· W855910777 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Нудельман Мария Александровна

Bibliographic record

VenueВ мире науки и искусства: вопросы филологии, искусствоведения и культурологии · 2015
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLexicography and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLexemeLinguisticsHistorySemantics (computer science)PhilosophyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The usage of semantic and systematizing method let us ascertain that one of the lexemes which are able to express the conceptual dominant “remission from punishment” in the legal language world image of Canadian English is the lexeme “oblivion”. The article deals with the semantic development of the lexeme “oblivion” in the diachronic aspect. The research is carried out by the division of Canadian legal texts into two periods, such as the 18 th-19 th centuries and the 20 th-21 st centuries respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueВ мире науки и искусства: вопросы филологии, искусствоведения и культурологииSame topicLexicography and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207