MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W855986327

Breeding of New Silkworm Variety Golden silk, a Yellow Cocoon Color for Spring Rearing Season

2007· article· en· W855986327 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pil‐Don Kang, Sang‐Uk Lee, I-Yeon Jung, Bong-Hee Shon, Young Soon Kim, Kee‐Young Kim, Mi‐Ja Kim, In-Pyo Hong, Kwang-Gill Lee, Kwang-Young Park

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sericultural and Entomological Science · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSilkworms and Sericulture Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSILKPupaBiologyLarvaBombyx moriHorticultureSericultureSpring (device)Animal scienceBotanyEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new silkworm variety for spring rearing season is hybrid between Jam311, a Japanese race bred from introduction breeding and Jam312, a Chinese race from introduction breeding. In the local adaptability test performed at 8 local areas in spring of 2006, Golden silk was showed 7 percent higher in hatchability than authorized silk-worm races laval. Golden silk was receded higher 1.7 percent, 2.2 percent in pupation rate, best cocoon rate respectively than Chunsujam. The larval period shortened for 1.12 day even though low record to the several items including productivity than Chunsujam. Golden silk was showed 1,031 m, 2.97 denier in length of cocoon filament, weight of cocoon filament respectively. The concentration of Deoxynojirimycin(DNJ) was measured 4.34 mg in Golden silk, high then to Chunsujam(3.81 mg). In the Paecilomyces tenuipes production ability test, the pupal weight of Golden silk was 1.20g.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sericultural and Entomological ScienceSame topicSilkworms and Sericulture ResearchFrench-language works237,207