MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W861637119

Klinische und angiographische Akut- und Langzeitergebnisse nach direkter Stentimplantation bei Patienten mit symptomatischer koronarer Herzkrankheit

2006· article· en· W861637119 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study presented the acute- and long- time results of patients with coronary artery disease who undergo direct stent implantation. The values are resulted on one side from digital quantitative coronary coronarangiography (QCA) and on the other side from the clinical symptoms classified by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) and the New York Heart Association (NYHA).Angiographic results:The proximal, mean and distal reference diameter did not vary between the various measurements. The minimal lumen diameter (MLD) increased from 0.8 (SD 0.4) mm up to 2.5 (SD 0.8) mm. This corresponds with an acute gain of 1.6 (SD 0.8) mm. At the follow-up was the value of MLD 1.6 (SD 0.8) mm, resulting a late loss of 0.5 (SD 0.9) mm. The net gain was 1.1 (SD 0.7) mm. The mean diameter of stenosis correlates similar to the MLD. The length of stenosis was quantified with 9.5 (SD 4.1) mm. The mean ballon diameter was 3.0 (SD 0.4) mm. The mean diameter of stenosis after intervention was calculated with 14%, after round about 6 months with 28%. In 46 cases (28%) a new stenosis in the stent area could be detected. In a group of 20 patients (43%) remained a restenosis (> 50% diameter of stenosis).Clinical results:Our patients had a lot of angiographic characteristics which come along with an increased risk of a worse outcome. Especially this relates to the high incidence of multivessel-disease and complex with partly thrombus containing stenosis (type B2 / C). Despite of this, the results from the digital quantitative coronarangiography and the clinical outcomes showed a very good angiographic and clinical output after direct stent implantation. 92% of the patients (n= 151) were significantly relieved of their symptoms and 1/3 was completely without any symptoms.The data analysis showed that the clinical outcomes of the patients differed often from the angiographic results of the therapied lesions. The target vessel minimal lumen diameter (MLD) of the patients with permanent angina pectoris or dyspnoe symtoms did not differ from those who had not any clinical symptoms (2.0 (SD 0.7) mm vs. 2.0 (SD 0.7) mm). 70% of these patients had a multivessel-disease. All stents with one exception offered an excellent angiographic result (mean diameter stenosis of 32%) at the follow-up.28 patients (17%) were hospitalised because of cardiological reasons, 86% had symptoms of angina pectoris. In 25 cases the follow-up was brought forward. 80% out of it had an excellent result of the stent (mean diameter of stenosis 30.4%). In case of 16 patients the angina pectoris symptoms were caused by stenosis outside of the target vessel, in 11 cases occured a Re-PTCA, in the other cases was a drug orientated concept established.In the meantime in 4 cases (2%) happened an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In 3 of it were the target vessel involved, but only by one patient was the reason located in the stent. In the other cases the ACS was caused by a subtotal stenosis distal the direct implanted stent (>/=5 mm). In more than one third of the cases in which the follow-up was brought forward, a reintervention happened. But only by 8% of the patients, who came to the regular follow-up, was a new intervention necessary. In total, at the regular follow-up in 25 cases (15%) a reintervention occured. By 13 Patienten (8%) was the target vessel (TVR) involved.At the analysis of potential predictors, which favoured restenosis, only some trends could be found. These correlated with the aspects which are described in the literature. For example long or complex lesions (type B / C) have promoted effects to the process of restenosis. The same for diabetes mellitus.Conclusion:The studie showed that in a great collective of stenosed lesions a very good angiographic and clinical outcome could be achieved.But the restenosis is independent from the kind of the stent implantation the Achilles tendon of the coronary angioplastie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it