MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W86186978

A review of adult survival rates in woodpeckers

2006· review· it· W86186978 on OpenAlexaff
Karen L. Wiebe

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales Zoologici Fennici · 2006
Typereview
Languageit
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWoodpeckerBiologyEcologyTaxonGeographyAvian clutch sizePopulationDemographyLife historyMortality rateReproductionHabitat
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although many forestry management strategies rely on population estimates of indicator species such as woodpeckers (family Picidae), empirical estimates of demographic parameters within this taxon are few. In this review, I searched the literature for survival estimates of woodpeckers and found information for 54% of North American species and 30% of European species. The average survival rate for all woodpecker species combined was 0.58 but varied from 0.30 to 0.93 in apparently stable populations. Data were few, but there was not a consistent pattern of sex-biased mortality. Among North American species, there was a negative correlation between clutch size and survival consistent with life history theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.549
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales Zoologici FenniciSame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207