Islamic conditions for sustainable development: A case study of International Islamic School (IIS), IIUM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Different types of development are required for modern comfortable existence and improvement of all aspects of human life. Important among them are human, moral, economic, infrastructural, social, and educational developments. All these developments can be either only for present generation, or they can be for both present and future generations to come. If these developments are beneficial only for present generation but they are harmful for future generations, they are not considered to be sustainable developments. When it had been discovered that in their developmental works, some developers did not consider the welfare of the future generations and therefore these developments had been proved to be harmful for them (future generations), some governments started to impose conditions for sustainable development. One of these early governments who imposed these conditions was the government of Canada. Canadian conditions are not comprehensive. A set of comprehensive conditions for this development is yet to be developed. Islam also has conditions of sustainable development. Analyzing the related Qur’anic verses and Prophetic ahadith, this paper intends to develop a set of comprehensive conditions of sustainable development so that they will be beneficial for those governments and organizations who really want to do sustainable development for both present and future generations. Additionally, this study intends to conduct a survey to determine whether IIS building complex fulfills these conditions or not.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".