Insights from Genomic Studies of the Foodborne and Waterborne Pathogen<i>Escherichia coli</i>O157:H7
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this chapter, the knowledge of the genome of E. coli O157:H7 may be used in the control of serious foodborne pathogen, E. coli strains are associated with gastrointestinal and extraintestinal illness. The E. coli O157:H7 genome provides us with information about the evolution and emergence of pathogen and the diversity that exists within populations of E. coli O157:H7. Most of E. coli prophage are defective and cannot form infectious phage. This chapter provides a brief review of subtyping methods used to characterize E. coli O157:H7 strains. Differences in biochemical utilization can be used to distinguish large categories of E. coli strain. Following the generation of cDNA from the bacteria's mRNA using the enzyme reverse transcriptase, the level of gene expression is inferred from the intensity of the label signal from gene-specific microarray spots following hybridization. This procedure is the foundation of the new science of transcriptomics. Typically, quantitative PCR assays are also carried out on selected genes to measure mRNA levels to verify the significant changes in expression of genes observed in microarray-based transcriptomics studies. It is also evident that our understanding of E. coli O157:H7 gene regulatory systems will be enhanced through genomic sciences. E. coli O157:H7 and other bacterial pathogens have evolved through the acquisition of gene clusters borne on plasmids, bacteriophages, and genomic islands. Finally, with the arrival of the genomics revolution researchers are able to examine the "pan-genome" of the species and specific groups within species such as enterohemorrhagic E. coli(EHEC) and E. coli O157:H7.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".