MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W86989637

Использование психофизиологического индивидуально-типологического подхода у курсантов военных вузов в зависимости от наличия и степени выраженности табакокурения как фактора риска язвенной болезни двенадцатиперстной кишки

2009· article· ru· W86989637 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Федоров Артем Николаевич

Bibliographic record

VenueСаратовский научно-медицинский журнал · 2009
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, psychology, and well-being
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoping (psychology)Clinical psychologyPersonalityPsychologyDiseaseMedicineTest (biology)Duodenal ulcerPsychiatrySocial psychologyGastroenterologyInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the purpose to increase the efficacy of measures to the primary prophylaxis of duodenal ulcer disease among soldiers and officers, 120 students of higher military educational institutions were examined by means of the psychophysiological tests: brief multifactorial questionnaire for personality research, Ch. Spielberger-Yu. Khanin test, psychogeometrical test, Toronto alexitimitical scale, E. Heim method of coping-behaviour construction. It is revealed, that the increase of tobacco smoking intensity initiates the number of representatives of the III (contradictory) psychophysiological type grow, and it intensifies the probability of duodenal ulcer disease morbidity rise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.484
Teacher spread0.416 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueСаратовский научно-медицинский журналSame topicHealth, psychology, and well-beingFrench-language works237,207