T2 glottic carcinoma: analysis of recurrences in 36 cases undergoing primary transoral laser microsurgery resection.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Between 2002 and 2008, over 100 patients with glottic carcinoma have undergone transoral laser microsurgical (TLM) resection at the QEII Health Sciences Centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia. The objective of this study was to assess the oncologic outcomes for all cases staged as T2 in this cohort. METHODS: A prospective database was developed to monitor outcomes. All 36 cases of primary T2 glottic carcinoma were selected from the database for analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses evaluated the following end points at 36 months: overall survival, disease-specific survival, and local control and disease-free survival with one procedure. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier estimates of 36-month outcomes were 89% (SE 6.0%) overall survival and disease-specific survival, 81% (SE 7.1%) local control with one procedure, and 70% (SE 8.0%) disease-free survival with one procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The observed 36-month outcomes support the use of TLM as the primary treatment modality for T2 glottic cancers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".