MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W873552429

英语阅读课教学设计探究----A Trip on "The True North"

2013· article· zh· W873552429 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
戚华荣

Bibliographic record

Venue读写算:教育导刊 · 2013
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEducational Reforms and Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

人教版模块5Unit5Canada--“TheTrueNorth”的阅读部分,是篇游记,记述了李代宇和刘谦去加拿大看望表兄妹的旅途见闻。通过本节课让学生学会1.能够说出加拿大的地貌,城市,人口,生态环境等概况。2.通过跳读,看地图能找到乘火车的具体路线,经过的景点。3.通过细读学生能够描述中途Calgary,ThunderBay,TheGreatLakes等具体的自然美景和见闻。4.学生能够用自己的语言总结概括出加拿大的特征。5.能够进一步运用所学的词汇描述途中印象深刻见闻。以下是我对本节课的设计:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.018
Scholarly communication0.0120.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue读写算:教育导刊Same topicEducational Reforms and InnovationsFrench-language works237,207