MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W874284291 · doi:10.4000/books.pum.13227

35. La nouvelle histoire du Québec vue de l’intérieur

2006· book-chapter· fr· W874284291 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paul-André Linteau

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks · 2006
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Être un jeune historien, à la fin des années 1960 et au début des années 1970, a représenté une expérience fascinante et, par bien des aspects, unique. Ce fut, en quelque sorte, un rendez-vous exceptionnel avec l’histoire et, qui plus est, cette expérience n’était pas vécue isolément. Être un jeune historien au tournant des années 1970 signifiait être entouré de plusieurs autres jeunes historiens et vivre avec eux, d’une certaine façon, une expérience collective. C’est ce que je voudrais ten...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.148
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooksSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207